Back to Blog
Gridlock government5/12/2023 ![]() This, in turn, will continue to sicken our lake, make our beaches less inviting, and weaken our economy. ![]() But we will face even greater costs if this process does not move with greater urgency.Įvery day wasted is another day Lake Champlain suffers. Ensuring projects are done safely and government money is going to the right places is a difficult process that takes energy and time. The organization and distribution of government funds are tasks that are neither easy nor small. Our lake is dying due to the inefficiency and heavy-handedness of the state government. … That's a huge deterrent for any of those programs.” … I won't get paid until the job is complete, inspected, they've crossed their t's, dotted their i's and then take three weeks of vacation to think about it, and then they'll pay me. Another stated, “I don't see that money for a long time. One farmer said it took five to six rounds of signatures to approve a single project. The Vermont government cannot still claim to be environmental stewards when it is discouraging eager farmers who are voluntarily seeking out these eco-friendly programs. As shown in interviews from the scientific study by Ecosystem Service, the majority of farmers all individually claimed that reduced government bureaucracy would improve both programs. Minimizing this runoff is the only hope the Lake Champlain basin has to achieve a healthy ecosystem.Īccording to studies, the main reasons that farmers reject the Environmental Quality Incentive Program are bureaucracy and over-regulation. Runoff from agricultural sectors accounts for 38% of the phosphorus in Lake Champlain. As one frustrated farmer said, “I don't know who sets the standards for these things, but they're not farmers.” Only about 14.3% of agricultural land in Vermont is enrolled in the environmental quality program, and far less in the conservation reserve program, despite the benefits these programs bring to both the farm and the environment.įarmers believe the transaction costs for these programs are too high and the paperwork too complex, leading to 20% of farms ending their contract in the first five years. The Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is another program that helps farmers to protect environmentally sensitive land. The program provides both one-on-one guidance and financial assistance to carry out improvements such as reducing animal feedlot contamination and runoff. ![]() The first is the Environmental Quality Incentive Program, a voluntary project that pairs farms with environmental professionals to create sustainable practices and solutions while addressing their farming needs. It is important to examine interest groups and divided government in tandem to understand their relative impacts upon the policy process in the states.The Vermont government has helped stymie two potentially significant programs. Interest group proliferation also decreased the odds of bill passage in some policy areas but increased the odds in other arenas. Previous scholars have failed to detect the negative effects of divided government because the effects differed across policy areas. When the control of the legislature itself was split, divided government had a positive (or insignificant) effect in less conflictual policy areas. ![]() Using data from the 50 states, we found that when a governor faced a legislature controlled by the opposition party, divided government did make passage of conflictual policy more difficult. We hypothesize that these two factors will differentially affect the legislative process in eight different policy areas even if they do not affect the overall output of legislation. Recent research has focused on divided government and interest representation as sources of legislative gridlock.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |